Automating Freshman Course Placement and Registration: A Case Study
Full Text

Keywords

freshmen registration
placement automation
student information system
academic advising
course planning
institutional efficiency

How to Cite

Vijayakumar, B., Alapati, S., & Karamutti Varadaraju, S. (2025). Automating Freshman Course Placement and Registration: A Case Study. EdgeCon Proceedings, 1(1). Retrieved from https://edgeconproceedings.net/index.php/ecprcdgs/article/view/535

Abstract

This implementation report explores Rowan University's efforts to automate first-year course placement and registration. Historically, Freshman Instructional Guides (FIGS) at Rowan were manually executed, requiring significant time from Testing Services, University Advising, and the Registrar's Office to evaluate placement needs and assign students to courses. Given the 57% surge in first-time degree-seeking student enrollment over a decade, the manual processes became increasingly unsustainable. In response, a cross-departmental team developed a comprehensive automated process to integrate data from Banner (Student Information System), Google Sheets maintained by Advising, and other sources. This computerized process classifies students by program groupings, determines primary and secondary course placements, checks Banner for real-time availability and constraints, and completes bulk course registration for first-year students. The resulting system processed over 3500 incoming students, saving over 350 hours annually, reduced the potential for human error, and enabled staff to shift focus from administrative work to strategic advising. This report outlines the implementation context, design architecture, technical integration, assessment methods, lessons learned, and practical implications for institutions with similar challenges.

Full Text

References

Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America's community colleges: A more straightforward path to student success. Harvard University Press.

Bailey, T., & Mabel, Z. (2022). The next generation of guided pathways: Building sustainability into student success reforms. American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org

Bailey, T., Mabel, Z., & Jenkins, D. (2023). Scaling student success reforms through guided pathways 2.0. Community College Research Center. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu

Crosta, P. M. (2013). Intensity and attachment: How the chaotic enrollment patterns of community college students relate to educational outcomes. Community College Review, 41(2), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552112471556

EDUCAUSE. (2023). AI and automation in academic operations: Emerging trends and institutional readiness. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu

EDUCAUSE. (2024). Horizon Report: Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2024

Ellucian. (2023). University of Central Florida streamlines registration with data-informed automation. Ellucian Case Study. https://www.ellucian.com

Klempin, S., & Karp, M. M. (2015). Creating a system for student success: How colleges can develop and scale technology-mediated advising. Community College Research Center. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/creating-system-student-success-technology-advising.html

Lane, J. E., & Lyle, J. A. (2020). Automating the student lifecycle: Early adoption of end-to-end planning systems. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/7/automating-the-student-lifecycle

NACADA. (2021). Technology in advising: Enhancing efficiency and equity. National Academic Advising Association White Paper. https://nacada.ksu.edu

Tyton Partners. (2022). Driving toward a digitally transformed student experience. Tyton Partners Research Brief. https://tytonpartners.com